0.07/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:23:39 EDT 2024 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.46 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7NV34kaMkV/E---3.1_31360.p 0.19/0.48 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 720s (4) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 360s (2) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_4 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # post_as_ho4 with pid 31446 completed with status 0 0.19/0.48 # Result found by post_as_ho4 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 720s (4) cores 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSFFMMBN 0.19/0.48 # partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF11-SSFFMSBN 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 289s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_8 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_4 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # new_ho_8 with pid 31456 completed with status 9 0.19/0.48 # new_ho_4 with pid 31457 completed with status 9 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 104s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # post_as_ho5 with pid 31458 completed with status 0 0.19/0.48 # Result found by post_as_ho5 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSLSNSFA. 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 720s (4) cores 0.19/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.48 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSFFMMBN 0.19/0.48 # partial match(2): HGUNF-FFSF11-SSFFMSBN 0.19/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 4 cores with 720 seconds (720 total) 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 289s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_8 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting new_ho_4 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Starting post_as_ho5 with 109s (1) cores 0.19/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # Proof found! 0.19/0.48 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_22, type, c0: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_23, type, cS: $i > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_24, type, cIND: $o). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_25, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(decl_26, type, esk2_0: $i). 0.19/0.48 thf(cTHM578, conjecture, (![X3:$i]:((((X3)=(c0))|?[X4:$i]:(((X3)=(cS @ X4)))))<=(cIND)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7NV34kaMkV/E---3.1_31360.p', cTHM578)). 0.19/0.48 thf(cIND_def, axiom, ((cIND)<=>![X1:$i > $o]:((((X1 @ c0)&![X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2)=>(X1 @ (cS @ X2)))))=>![X2:$i]:((X1 @ X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7NV34kaMkV/E---3.1_31360.p', cIND_def)). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~((![X10:$i > $o]:((((X10 @ c0)&![X11:$i]:(((X10 @ X11)=>(X10 @ (cS @ X11)))))=>![X12:$i]:((X10 @ X12))))=>![X3:$i]:((((X3)=(c0))|?[X4:$i]:(((X3)=(cS @ X4))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM578]), cIND_def])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X13:$i > $o, X15:$i, X17:$i]:(((((X13 @ (esk1_1 @ X13))|~(X13 @ c0)|(X13 @ X15))&(~(X13 @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ X13)))|~(X13 @ c0)|(X13 @ X15)))&(((esk2_0)!=(c0))&((esk2_0)!=(cS @ X17))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2)|~((X1 @ (cS @ (esk1_1 @ X1))))|~((X1 @ c0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((esk2_0)!=(cS @ X2))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((((cS @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 4 */:$i]:(((Z0)!=(X2))))))=(X2))|((c0)=(X2)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_4])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0)!=(c0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 0.19/0.48 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])]), c_0_7]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.48 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 5 0.19/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses : 7 0.19/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3 0.19/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.19/0.48 # Processed clauses : 15 0.19/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.19/0.48 # ...subsumed : 1 0.19/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 14 0.19/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3 0.19/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 1 0.19/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 1 0.19/0.48 # Generated clauses : 34 0.19/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26 0.19/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.48 # Paramodulations : 19 0.19/0.48 # Factorizations : 4 0.19/0.48 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 5 0.19/0.48 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.19/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 1 0.19/0.48 # ...of those cached : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 8 0.19/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1 0.19/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.19/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 5 0.19/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4 0.19/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 14 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 6 0.19/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5 0.19/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5 0.19/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.19/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.19/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1 0.19/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 1 0.19/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.19/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1346 0.19/0.48 # Search garbage collected termcells : 171 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.008 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.005 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.012 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages 0.19/0.48 0.19/0.48 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.48 # User time : 0.014 s 0.19/0.48 # System time : 0.009 s 0.19/0.48 # Total time : 0.023 s 0.19/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages 0.19/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting 0.19/0.49 % E exiting 0.19/0.49 EOF